1.北京中医药大学国家中医药高等教育研究院 北京 102488
2.全国中医药教育发展中心 北京 102488
袁娜,女,硕士,助理研究员
# 焦楠,女,硕士,副研究员,硕士生导师
纸质出版日期:2023-09-30,
收稿日期:2023-03-21,
移动端阅览
袁娜, 焦楠. 医学院校教师教学效能感量表的中文版修订及信效度检验[J]. 中医教育, 2023,42(5):39-42.
YUAN Na, JIAO Nan. Chinese version of Physician Teaching Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and its reliability and validity assessment[J]. Education of Chinese Medicine, 2023,42(5):39-42.
袁娜, 焦楠. 医学院校教师教学效能感量表的中文版修订及信效度检验[J]. 中医教育, 2023,42(5):39-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2023.05.158.
YUAN Na, JIAO Nan. Chinese version of Physician Teaching Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and its reliability and validity assessment[J]. Education of Chinese Medicine, 2023,42(5):39-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2023.05.158.
目的
2
对医学院校教师教学效能感量表(Physician Teaching Self-Efficacy Questionnaire,PTSQ)进行翻译(PTSQ-C)并检验其效度与信度。
方法
2
应用PTSQ-C对114例医学院校教师进行测量。
结果
2
验证性因素分析结果表明PTSQ 3个因子的结构拟合指数为CFI=0.936,TLI=0.924,SRMR=0.065,RMSEA=0.106。各维度因子负荷范围为一元自我效能感,0.642-0.774;二元自我效能感,0.631-0.812;三元自我效能感,0.965-0.982。平均内容效度S-CVI/Ave为0.96,所有条目CVI值在0.86-1.00之间。总量表内部一致性Cronbach′s alpha系数为0.894,各因子Cronbach′s alpha系数为0.875、0.842、0.991,总量表内部一致性信度为0.718。
结论
2
PTSQ-C量表内容效度及信度较好,结构效度虽不完全理想,但综合分析可接受。
Objective
2
To translate Physician Teaching Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PTSQ) into a Chinese version (PTSQ-C) and test its validity and reliability.
Methods
2
PTSQ-C was used to survey 114 medical college/university teachers.
Results
2
The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the structural fit indices for the three factors of PTSQ were CFI=0.936
TLI=0.924
SRMR=0.065
and RMSEA=0.106. The load ranges of the factors respectively were 0.642-0.774 for self-regulative self-efficacy
0.631-0.812 for dyadic regulation self-efficacy
and 0.965-0.982 for triadic regulation self-efficacy. The S-CVI/Ave was 0.96
and the values of CVI of all entries were between 0.86 and 1.00. While the Cronbach′s alpha of internal consistency was 0.894
and the Cronbach′s alphas of the three factors were 0.875
0.842
and 0.991
the reliability of PTSQ-C was 0.718.
Conclusion
2
The reliability and validity of the content of PTSQ-C are good although the validity of its structure is imperfect
so the questionnaire is generally effective.
医学院校教学效能感信效度量表汉化
medical colleges and universitiesteaching efficacyreliability and validityChinese translation of scale
俞国良,罗晓路. 教师教学效能感及其相关因素研究[J]. 北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2000(1): 72-79.
刘晓明,王丽荣,金宏章,等. 职业压力影响中小学教师职业倦怠的作用机制研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2008, 16(5): 537-539.
王晓一,陈昕,刘力勇,等. 论高等医学院校青年教师教学效能感的培养[J]. 华北煤炭医学院学报, 2008, 10(2): 270-271.
陈金梅,蒋凤艳. 医教协同视角下地方医学院校发展性临床教师教学能力培养体系构建与探索[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2019, 36(11): 849-851, 880.
徐玮云,潘竞红,龚新湘,等. 基于教师效能感提升的高校本科教学质量保障机制探讨[J]. 亚太教育, 2016(32): 17-18.
DYBOWSKI C, KRISTON L, HARENDZA S. Psychome-tric properties of the newly developed Physician Teaching Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PTSQ)[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2016, 16(1): 247.
徐韦云,汪作为,茅荣杰,等. 精神分裂症复发先兆量表的汉化及效度和信度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(5): 887-890, 1043.
韦嘉,张春雨,董山川,等. 中文版Friedman-Bendas考试焦虑量表在中学生群体中的试用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(4): 718-722, 726.
史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2): 49-52.
WALTZ C F, STRICKLAND O L, LENZ E R. Measurement in Nursing and Health Research[M]. New York: Springer, 2016.
钱中清,齐玉龙. 德国高等教育理念对我国地方高水平医学院校建设的启示[J]. 医学教育管理, 2016, 2(3): 520-523, 543.
BURGOON J M, MEECE J L, GRANGER N A. Self-efficacy′s influence on student academic achievement in the medical anatomy curriculum[J]. Anat Sci Educ, 2012, 5(5): 249-255.
JEPSON C, ASCH D A, HERSHEY J C, et al. In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005, 58(1): 103-105.
0
浏览量
100
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构