1.北京中医药大学 北京 100029
2.国家教育行政学院 北京 102627
邢景丽 女,博士,讲师
# 刘兆兰,女,博士,教授,博士生导师
纸质出版日期:2023-09-30,
收稿日期:2023-05-20,
移动端阅览
邢景丽, 顾元烨, 刘澜月, 等. 医学统计学课程中拼图式教学法的效果评价及相关因素研究[J]. 中医教育, 2023,42(5):27-34.
XING Jingli, GU Yuanye, LIU Lanyue, et al. Evaluation of teaching effects and related factors of jigsaw teaching in the course Medical Statistics[J]. Education of Chinese Medicine, 2023,42(5):27-34.
邢景丽, 顾元烨, 刘澜月, 等. 医学统计学课程中拼图式教学法的效果评价及相关因素研究[J]. 中医教育, 2023,42(5):27-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2023.05.288.
XING Jingli, GU Yuanye, LIU Lanyue, et al. Evaluation of teaching effects and related factors of jigsaw teaching in the course Medical Statistics[J]. Education of Chinese Medicine, 2023,42(5):27-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2023.05.288.
目的
2
探究拼图式教学法在本科医学统计学的教学效果及其相关因素。
方法
2
采用横断面研究设计,对北京中医药大学中医学院8个班级学生进行问卷调查,收集调查学生基本信息、学业相关信息、成绩相关信息、交流恐惧量表等信息;采用交叉设计方法,对2个班级同学分别采用拼图式教学法和传统教学法进行教学,并收集2个班级交叉前后教学效果信息,应用 SPSS 27.0 和R语言进行组间和多因素统计分析。
结果
2
在227位大学生中,低、中、高度交流恐惧的人数分别为37(16.3%)例、139(61.2%)例、51(22.5%)例。城镇及农村的大学生中、高度交流恐惧所占比例高。没有学生干部经历的大学生中、高度交流恐惧所占比例高。拼图式教学法的教学效果(以测验成绩为指标)在五年制和八年制不同班级间存在差异(
t
=3.443,
P
<
0.05),五年制比八年制平均分高4.7分。交叉设计研究发现,拼图式教学法的教学效果好于传统教学法,
t
检验教学时,拼图式教学法学习成绩平均分比传统法高4.63分,在卡方检验教学时,拼图式教学法学习成绩平均分比传统法高3.16分。随着大学生交流恐惧等级增加,学习成绩平均分呈现下降趋势(相关系数为-0.159),但拼图式教学效果与交流恐惧等级分布没有统计学关联(
χ
2
=0.754,
P
=0.686)。
结论
2
拼图式教学法教学模式可帮助克服来自不同地区、不同成长环境、学生干部经历的大学生们的社交恐惧。拼图式教学法的教学效果好于传统教学法。在医学院校开展拼图式教学法,不仅有助于学生克服社交恐惧,而且有助于提高教学效果和质量。
Objective
2
To explore the effects and related factors of jigsaw teaching in the undergraduate course Medical Statistics.
Methods
2
A questionnaire survey was conducted in a cross-sectional study of eight classes in the School of Chinese Medicine at Beijing University of Chinese Medicine to collect their basic information
academic information
score related information
and communication apprehension scale score as the baseline. With a cross-over design
two classes of students were taught using both jigsaw-based teaching and traditional teaching methods respectively
and the teaching effects before and after the cross-over was compared. SPSS 27.0 and R language were used for multiple group factor analysis.
Results
2
Among 227 college students
37 (16.3%)
139 (61.2%) and 51 (22.5%) demonstrated low
medium
and high communication apprehension respectively. A large proportion of college students from both urban and rural areas suffered from high apprehension. There is a big proportion of college students who have never been leaders and have high level of apprehension. The teaching effects of the jigsaw technique (measured with quiz scores) varied between classes of the five-year and eight-year programs with statistical significance (
t
=3.443
P
<
0.05)
students of the five-year program scoring 4.7 points higher than those of the eight-year program. The crossover study found that the teaching effects of the jigsaw method was better than that of the traditional teaching method. Students′ average score with the jigsaw teaching was 4.63 points higher than that with the traditional method in the t test while the former was 3.16 points higher than the latter in the Chi-squared test. As the communication apprehension level of college students increased
the mean score of academic performance manifested a downward trend (correlation coefficient -0.159)
but there was no statistical correlation between the effects of jigsaw teaching and the level distribution of such apprehension (
χ
2
=0.754
P
=0.686).
Conclusion
2
Jigsaw teaching can help students from different regions and growth environments
and with different leadership experiences overcome their communication apprehension. The teaching effects of the jigsaw technique was better than that of traditional teaching methods. Applying this method in medical colleges and universities could not only help students overcome the apprehension
but also improve teaching effects and quality.
拼图式教学法交叉设计交流恐惧教学效果logistics回归
jigsawcross-sectional studycommunication apprehensionteaching effectslogistic regression
蔡文育. 大学英语碎片化学习与拼图化教学[J]. 教书育人(高教论坛), 2016(33): 94-95.
林小芳,鲍丽娟. 拼图教学法在儿科实习护生带教中的应用[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2022(11): 115-116.
STANCZAK A, DARNON C, ROBERT A, et al. Supplemental material for Do jigsaw classrooms improve learning outcomes? five experiments and an internal meta-analysis[J]. J Educ Psychol, 2022, 114(6): 1461-1476.
黄娟,袁智斌,傅霖. 大学公选课中运用“切块拼接法”改善学习效果的探索[J]. 高教探索, 2014(2): 113-118.
PREMO J, CAVAGNETTO A, DAVIS W B, et al. Promoting collaborative classrooms: the impacts of interdependent cooperative learning on undergraduate interactions and achievement[J]. CBE Life Sci Educ, 2018, 17(2): ar32.
MOHEBBI Z, MORTEZAEI-HAFTADOR A, MEHRABI M. Synchronous online lecturing or blended flipped classroom with jigsaw: an educational intervention during the Covid-19 pandemic[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2022, 22(1): 845.
刘兆兰,李兰花,蒋慧惠,等. 应用横断面研究探讨中医药院校医学统计学教学促进策略[J]. 中医教育, 2010, 29(6): 24-27.
刘兆兰,赵楠琦,贾丽燕,等. 中医专业大学生交流恐惧现状及相关因素研究[J]. 中医教育, 2017, 36(3): 63-66.
赵红利. 大学生交流恐惧心理现状调查[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2014(8): 69-71.
MCCROSKEY J C. Validity of the PRCA as an index of oral communication apprehension[J]. Commun Monogr, 1978, 45(3): 192-203.
陈军. 中医院校大学生交流恐惧调查及影响因素分析[J]. 合肥学院学报(社会科学版), 2013, 30(6): 127-130.
张庆娟,潘玉进. 医学专业贫困大学生交流恐惧现状调查及其与人格的关系研究[J]. 中国西部科技, 2011, 10(19): 80-81, 87.
胡寒春,王洪礼,邓云龙,等. 大学新生交流恐惧的多因素影响模型[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2007, 21(12): 829-831, 852.
龚勋,蔡太生,窦芬,等. 羞怯与大学生错失恐惧:领悟社会支持的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2022, 30(5): 1121-1125.
赵红利. 我国大学生交流恐惧研究的现状述评[J]. 中国电力教育, 2012(11): 115-116, 121.
0
浏览量
50
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构